The federal government’s special envoy to combat antisemitism, Jillian Segal, has recommended appointing an external independent ombudsman to monitor the ABC and SBS over their reporting on Israel and the Middle East.

Proposal for External Scrutiny of Public Broadcasters

As reported by The Guardian Australia, the recommendation forms a central plank of an updated national strategy released by Ms Segal on Friday aimed at curbing antisemitism across the country.

Under the proposal, Australia’s two taxpayer-funded public broadcasters would face a heightened layer of oversight dedicated specifically to monitoring coverage of the war in Gaza and wider Middle Eastern affairs.

Currently, both the ABC and SBS operate established editorial complaints frameworks—including the ABC’s independent editorial complaints director and overarching oversight by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). However, Ms Segal argued that the scale of prevailing community concern warrants an additional, external layer of independent review.

Public Perceptions and Social Cohesion at Stake

The special envoy maintained that community sentiment regarding broadcast impartiality could not be ignored by policymakers.

According to The Guardian Australia, Ms Segal stated that the perception of a direct link between media coverage of foreign conflicts and domestic hostility towards Jewish Australians was itself a matter of public importance.

Advocacy organisations within the Jewish community have frequently raised concerns over the framing, language, and sourcing used in broadcast bulletins since the October 7 attacks and Israel's subsequent military campaign in the Gaza Strip. The envoy's proposal suggests a dedicated ombudsman would help restore broader public trust and ensure coverage adheres strictly to statutory requirements of accuracy and balance.

Curbs on Ideological Activism in the Arts

Beyond public broadcasting, Ms Segal’s updated blueprint turned its attention to the cultural sector, recommending sweeping behavioural guidelines for artistic and cultural bodies.

The envoy proposed that government-funded arts organisations implement clear codes of conduct designed to limit what was described as personal political or ideological activism.

Australia's creative industries have witnessed significant friction over the past year, with multiple high-profile literary, theatrical, and visual arts events affected by protests, boycotts, and resignations. Under the envoy's recommendations, institutions receiving public money would be held to stricter standards to prevent cultural platforms from being utilised for partisan political messaging that alienates audiences.

Editorial Independence and Existing Safeguards Under Debate

The recommendations are expected to trigger sharp debate among media unions, civil liberties groups, and press freedom advocates, who have traditionally opposed external bodies being placed over the governance of national broadcasters.

Opponents of external intervention frequently argue that existing legislative charters and ACMA processes are already sufficient, and that specialised monitoring regimes risk chilling free expression and investigative journalism in sensitive foreign affairs reporting.

The Albanese government, which appointed Ms Segal to the envoy role earlier this year to address rising social cohesion challenges, has not yet formally responded to the recommendations.